Members' Comments

I have to agree with the assessment that Newton would have loved Jane. Every time one of her sets comes up, my first inclination is to give it a pass, as I don't think the Bettie Page hair works for her, I don't care for the overabundance of eyeshadow either she or the make-up person prefers, and there's a hint of androgyny that I don;t find particularly appealing (something I suspect is a result of my first two dislikes, but perhaps not). But she is compelling, just as I find Newton's photos. And suddenly, I'm downloading another set. In other words, Jane challenges me every time, and, over and over again, I have to accept her on her terms. When I look at these shots, I have to wonder if Petter feels the same. (I suspect he does.)

The biggest reason I'm a member here is because of something I call curated variety. I enjoy the range of models while at the same time appreciating they nearly all fit a certain aesthetic. Jane is wonderfully no exception. As her profile states, there is that powerful Helmet Newton appearance. It's her beauty, it's the fringe, it's that stoicism.

When a woman lies on her side or back her more fleshy parts are subject to gravitational forces and this changes her shape. On her side she appears to have more pronounced hips, on her back her hip bones protrude as her stomach sinks. Her breasts flatten and spread if they are natural, if surgically enhanced they retain the shape of pomegranates whatever position she adopts. Have another look Ken.

I agree that her tits are real. They are beautiful, and so is she. My frustration is not that the all models don't spread wide, but it would be nice if the ones that don't would at least do a full frontal so we could see their full beauty. Luba is a gorgeous woman and it is very understandable that we would want to enjoy her fully!

Although Jane may have real breasts, may have, there's no denying that she has dyed hair and a homely face. Jane is no Luba.

Whilst I do not condone Ken's comments, I do feel he has incurred your wrath because the two previous comments and several posted on Luba's gallery were all posing the same question and I can understand your sensitivity regarding Luba. Obviously you could not contain your frustrations and Ken was the final straw!

1. I have said it before and I will say it again: her tits are real ! too bad for you that you can not recognize true beauty. 2. please understand that top models like jane, luba and others, that exclusively chose to bare their naked body for hegre-art, are not the average "internet-porn-girl" that just spread their legs. there is enough of that out there already... and there is actually plenty of pink on this site as well... so what you get here is a variety. take it or leave it :-)

I still think Jane has the face that belongs on the cover of Vogue. I think she is very stunning and beautiful. Very nice Petter thanks as always. Paul Mcg

Peter clearly loves this girl despite her fake hair, plastic boobs, absence of a vagina and homely face. How else can you explain why she keeps reappearing on the site.

What is going on in this website? Most of the recent galleries are showing little or nothing of the model. The Luba gallery, this one, the seals gallery, most of the ones from Mexico, all are as someone else said "chaste". We are not paying for soft, soft, soft photos. I can see more at some bikini retailer websites.